THE IRAN HOSTAGE CRISIS: WHEN COMPROMISE FAILS
  • Title
  • Thesis
  • Historical Context
    • ECONOMIC CONFLICT
    • POLITICAL CONFLICT
    • HUMANITARIAN CONFLICT
  • The Iran Hostage Crisis
  • The Struggle to Compromise
    • FAILED NEGOTIATIONS
    • FAILED MILITARY INTERVENTION
  • CONCLUSION
  • Research
    • Annotated Bibliography
    • Process Paper
"Monarchist demonstrators in Tehran downtown, August 26, 1953", RT International

EXPLOITATION OF THE IRANIAN OIL
​INDUSTRY LAYS THE GROUNDWORK​ ​
FOR ECONOMIC CONFLICT


The exploitation of Iran’s lucrative oil market by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC)
​created ​an economic conflict of interest between Iran and the West.

The D’Arcy Concession of 1909 gave Britain’s AIOC exclusive prospecting rights for Iranian oil. The AIOC paid more in taxes to the British government than royalties to the Iranian government. Non-British AIOC workers were impoverished.
Wages were 50 cents a day. There was no vacation pay, no sick leave, no disability compensation. The workers lived in a shanty town … without running water or electricity.

-Manucher Farmanfarmaian, a non-British worker of the AIOC, "Documenting the Modern Oil City: Cinematic Urbanism in Anglo-Iranian’s Persian Story"
Picture
Slum in Abadan, Iran, Abadan:Retold

Led by Mohammad Mossadegh, outrage over Iran’s unequal share of oil revenues led to the Iranian Parliament’s nationalization of the AIOC in April 1951. Mossadegh was elected Prime Minister of Iran afterward.
Leslie Gilbert Illingworth, "The Daily Mail", May 17, 1951, A Cartoon History of the Middle East
Parade for oil nationalization, Tehran, June 3, 1951, "The Abadan Times"
Nationalization of Abadan oil refinery, 1951, ​Ajam Media Collective
​Mossadegh and supporters, September 27, 1951, Abadan, Civilization & Modernity
Picture
Mohammad Mossadegh, Man of the Year, "He oiled the wheels of chaos", ​
​January 7, 1952, TIME

Britain asked the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to execute a coup d’état against Mossadegh and return the shah to power.
...if Persia was allowed to get away with it, Egypt and other Middle East countries would be encouraged to think that they could try things on: the next thing might be an attempt to nationalise the Suez Canal.

-Emanuel Shinwell, the British Minister of Defense (1950-51), on the nationalization of the oil industry, "​Twilight of Colonialism: Mossadegh And the Suez Crisis"
On August 19, 1953, the CIA successfully ousted Mossadegh. The oil industry fell under foreign control once again, and the shah, who had previously fled the country, returned to Iran.
Picture
"Royalists Oust Mossadegh; 300 Die in Iranian Fighting; Shah is Flying Home Today,"
​August 20, 1953, ​The New York Times
Picture
State Department's "Proposal to Organize a Coup d'etat in Iran,"
November 26, 1952, 
​National Security Archives (Click to enlarge)
Pro-Shah riot, February 28, 1953, "The Times of Israel"
Mossadegh on trial, December 21, 1953, "The Times of Israel"
"Soldiers and tanks stand in the streets of Tehran after the deposition of Mossadegh in August 1953", "The Daily Mail"
Cleaning "Yankee Go Home" graffiti off a wall after the coup, Tehran, August 21, 1953, CNN
...as word began to leak out about the secret role played by the United States in keeping the shah on his throne there was for the first time a strong current of anti-Americanism abroad in the land.
​
-Don Lawson in his book America Held Hostage: The Iran Hostage Crisis and the Iran-Contra Affair
back
NEXT
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Title
  • Thesis
  • Historical Context
    • ECONOMIC CONFLICT
    • POLITICAL CONFLICT
    • HUMANITARIAN CONFLICT
  • The Iran Hostage Crisis
  • The Struggle to Compromise
    • FAILED NEGOTIATIONS
    • FAILED MILITARY INTERVENTION
  • CONCLUSION
  • Research
    • Annotated Bibliography
    • Process Paper